Ajouter un commentaire

UK : Will the weak Sterling rescue the British economy ?

Recommander cet article

...or should Britain adopt the Euro to help solve the crisis ?

The UK faces its first serious financial crisis at the beginning of the 21st century. In contrast to former financial crises, the current one is much more complex. There are many indicators that the UK may be confronted with a triple financial crisis : a combined banking-, sovereign debt- and currency-crisis. One way to solve the problem would be to take steps towards adopting the Euro.


The UK banks have had generous credit policies. In other words, they lend too much money to borrowers, especially in the manufacturing and real estate industry, on the assumption that prices will continue to rise. This lending policy was successful, at least in the short term, thanks to trust and confidence based on indicators, such as economic growth, stable prices especially in the real estate sector. However in the long run, these economic indicators turned out to be not as solid as once thought. As a result, this lack of confidence was also translated into the British currency sector where the sterling has lost substantially in value.

Why is the Sterling so weak at the moment ?

Currently 16 European Union states have adopted the euro as their sole legal tender - only the UK and Denmark have negotiated a formal opt-out from the common European currency.
Source : Wikipedia

The reason behind the current sterling’s weakness is devaluation. However the latter was agreed upon by the Bank of England to improve the situation in the UK. Its intention was to both correct an anomaly and render the British economy more competitive and boost its exports. Instead, the rapid weakening of the sterling created new problems. For instance, if the sterling continues to be depreciated it will boost inflation, at least temporarily, through the cost of imported consumer goods and services and through the cost of imported raw materials and intermediate inputs, which in turn will lead to the rise of unemployment.

Recently, Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned against any policies directed at managing the sterling’s exchange rate. He said that last attempts at targeting exchange rates had failed and that the Bank of England was currently to target inflation : « That is the best way to bring about recovery in the economy and I would caution him [David Cameron, Conservative leader] and his party against any policies that would target sterling », he said.

Gordon Brown has called for the government to do more to support the pound. As a matter of fact, the pound has fallen by around 20 percent against the Euro and has reached its lowest level against the dollar over the past 20 years. But still policymakers continue to think that the decline in sterling has a positive impact on the economy.

What could the British government do to struggle against the weak sterling ?

The British government can struggle against the weak sterling through two main kinds of measures. Firstly, the British government should reduce the exposure of the state to the private banking sector. This could be done through a capital injection.

By the end of 2008, the exchange rate between Euro and Sterling nearly reached 1:1
Source : modified from ECB

However, by injecting money into the banking sector, the state is still exposed to the banks which could mean a nationalisation. The British government has already followed this route with Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley. Consequently, the British government has guaranteed new medium term debt issuance by UK banks and therefore, guaranteed all deposits, retail and wholesale. Nevertheless, the main problem of nationalising a bank occurs when the bank goes bankrupt because the state has to reimburse all the bank debt. If the state does not make all creditors in full, the bank default becomes a sovereign default.

Secondly, the British government should reduce the threat of exchange rate crunch by (a) announcing that the UK is actively pursuing EMU (Economic and Monetary Union) membership at the earliest possible date and (b) ’adopting a peg with the Euro’ (Buiter, 2008). It would be very helpful for the British economy to have access to the resources of the Euro system. But to enter in the Euro zone, the UK must meet the so-called five convergence criteria. However, today’s British economy does not meet the debt criterion for EMU membership (gross general government debt less than 60 percent of annual GDP). Moreover, the UK does not meet the Maastricht deficit criterion either (general government financial deficit less than 3 percent of GDP). Yet, the inflation criterion will probably be met considering UK inflation and EU inflation seem to be well synchronised.

But what does the term ‘financial crisis’ mean ? In the broad sense of the term, it is when demand cannot meet the market. According to Willem Buiter a ‘financial crisis is a situation where quantity rationing of would-be borrowers and would-be sellers of securities suddenly replaces normal market clearing through variations in interest rates or market prices of securities’.

Moreover a sterling crisis does not require a fixed or managed exchange rate regime for sterling. It can occur even when sterling floats, which means, when its external value is market-determined, as it is today.

Should the UK adopt the euro ?

The UK has always been very independent from the rest of the EU. Sterling constitutes a consequent part of the British identity that is why British people appear to be quite to reluctant to adopt the euro money and to abandon the sterling. Over the past years, sterling has nearly always been very strong. However from the beginning of the financial crisis the sterling has lost substantially in value. That is why ; nowadays the British government start to think about adopting the euro. Nevertheless, the UK has to face to major difficulties such as public opinion and criteria set by the Maastricht Treaty.

Five economic tests for the introduction of the Euro

The five economic tests are the criteria defined by the UK Government that are to be used to assess if the UK is ready to join the Euro Area readiness to join the Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union and therefore to adopt the euro as its official currency. The five tests are as follows :

1. Are business cycles and economic structures compatible so that we and others could live comfortably with euro interest rates on a permanent basis ?

2. If problems emerge is there sufficient flexibility to deal with them ?

3. Would joining EMU create better conditions for firms making long-term decisions to invest in Britain ?

4. What impact would entry into EMU have on the competitive position of the UK’s financial services industry ?

5. In summary, will joining EMU promote higher growth, stability and a lasting increase in jobs ?

Definition : Exchange rate mechanism (ERM)

Process by which member countries of an economic community (such as the European Union) maintain exchange rate parity among their currencies. The currencies are allowed to fluctuate with respect to one another within a specified limit. If the exchange rate between any two currencies reaches the limit, the central banks of both countries intervene to bring it back within the limit. Source : Business Dictionnary

Even if some bookmakers were retending at the end of 2008 that the UK was about to join the Euro zone, it is hard to believe in the foreseeable future. On the one hand, euro sceptics see the single currency as the stepping stone to a unified European Union, which is by definition the idea that they have always strongly rejected. Moreover, the UK benefits from a particular position with its transatlantic relationship and it has always proclaimed itself to be independent from the rest of the EU. On the other hand, Gordon Brown has always rejected the idea to enter in the Euro zone ‘the decision not to join had been right for Britain and for Europe’. Moreover Tony Blair’s government had underlined that to enter in the Euro zone it was absolutely necessary to meet the ’five economic tests’. Nevertheless, only one of these criteria passed. Similarly, the government promised to hold a referendum on membership of the Euro zone once the five criteria were passed. In any case, it is absolutely necessary for the UK to meet the criteria (as described before) highlighted by the Treaty of Maastricht before applying for membership.

Considering the EMU criteria are not fully achieved by the UK, the UK is likely to set a fixed peg for sterling vis-à-vis the Euro or a central parity with a very narrow fluctuation margin with no more than 1 per cent on both sides. In doing so, the UK should begin the two year process so as to enter in the Euro zone. The European Council could eventually waive the Maastricht criteria for the UK because of the exceptional circumstances. A currency peg of the sterling against the Euro could make sense only if it is done with the full agreement of the European Central Bank and every member of the euro zone. The sterling would probably be a little bit less depreciated than it is currently which could avoid the UK to benefit from a competitive advantage.

The sterling crisis could be partially solved if the UK government would reduce the exposure of its banks by making new policies and legislation. Nevertheless, privatisation could create a high risk of a sovereign debt crisis and sterling crisis. What’s more, pegging the sterling vis-à-vis the Euro would be not only a sign of the formal entry of the UK into the Euro zone but also a sign of a stabilisation of the UK’s financial and macro economy. Both measures would remove the sovereign insolvency and exchange rate risks faced by the British economy.

The five convergence criteria (according to the European Commission)

What is measured :

Price stability, Sound public finances, Sustainable public finances, Durability of convergence, Exchange rate stability

How it is measured : Consumer price inflation rate : Not more than 1.5 percentage points above the rate of the three best performing Member States

Government deficit as % of GDP : Reference value : not more than 3%

Government debt as % of GDP : Reference value : not more than 60%

Long-term interest rate : Not more than 2 percentage points above the rate of the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability

Deviation from a central rate : Participation in ERM II for at least 2 years without severe tensions


Logo : isdky on flickr.com


Recommander cet article
reagir   Imprimer   envoyer par mail   Auteurs
Espace réactions (3)
ds Ajouter un commentaire
Michael C Feltham
1er juin 2009
20:07
Economic Forecasts and Analysis
UK : Will the weak Sterling rescue the British economy ?

I don’t know where you studied economics but personally, I’ demand my money back !

The root causes of Britain’s fiscal and economic problems are simple : Government removed most regulatory functions from the Bank of England early in their term : and thereafter allowed insane house price escalation predicated upon the lowest base bank interest rate for fifty years : additionally, banks were allowed to operate Marginal Reserve Lending at stupidly low ratios. The then Governor of the bank, Eddie George then synthetically depressed base rates in order to encourage an economic boom. Despite fully realising the obvious downside risks.

Additionally, unsecured consumer finance was encouraged to boom at an exponential rate : mainly to finance consumer’s binge on imported semi-durables from Asia.

Simultaneously, Balance of Trade Disequilibrium grew month on month unchecked, since the process of importing, warehousing, distributing and selling created extra transitory jobs.

Quite where you imagine banking funds were lent to “Manufacturing”, I know not : Britain lacks a cogent and vibrant industrial base : it was finally destroyed by Margaret Thatcher who decided to rely on the myth of “Service Industry” : and many of those service jobs were then exported to such as India et al. Devaluation causes Sterling’s weakness ?

With floating currencies it isn’t a central bank, which ultimately decides any currency’s value : it is the global Forex market !

The last person who tried to change the tide on foreign exchange values in Britain was one Norman Lamont : when he foolishly entered ERM at the wrong time ; at the wrong value : and with Britain’s economy ain process of entering the Bust Phase of the Thatcher-Lawson Boom-Bust !

Lamont wasted most of Britain’s reserves and much gold bullion, vainly trying to change reality : and the financier George Soros made over £1 Billion ! Central Banks acting in concert with IMF can adjust a wayward currency against limited speculation : however what really decides a currency’s value in a floating rate system is the holder’s Exchange Risk Exposure. Not sure how and why you consider Sterling is inflating : Britain has now entered a Deflation cycle ! As has been widely reported.

Despite your comments, it is clear that Gordon Brown and his Chancellor Alistair Darling haven’t a clue what they are doing : other than to gain back credibility by endeavouring at he forward PSBR cost to create a continuum of what was before.

Your final suggestion at this time is wholly risible !

Not only would the British government lose control of the small weapons they have (Discrete control over bank rate, money supply and fiscal stimulus), but the Eurozone itself is now entering a time of reality.

Jean Claude Trichet and his men have stupidly kept the Euro’s value high. Why did it rise so much ? Simply because as the US entered its own financial, fiscal and economic crisis and since the US dollar has been the main global Reserve Currency since post World War II, external holders of US dollars worried about their Risk Exposure and changed into Euros. Unfortunately this has had the effect of destroying the viability of most Euro-Manufacturing exporters, such as Airbus Industrie : and as Germany and France enter recession and Spain melts down, Portugal, Italy, Greece and Ireland are all economic basket cases.

Thus the Euro is far too high in value, relative to the underlying weakness of its constituent nation state’s economies.

Any ECB corrective action such as lowering base rates has been too little too late.

The Euro, or indeed any currency mechanism is not a sort of fiscal and financial panacea : quite the reverse.

In this case you maintain a troubled currency joining a mechanism about to enter trouble creates a successful outcome !

Which is a bit like suggesting General Motors should merge with Ford ; so they can both destroy each other simultaneously.

Perhaps this is the most amusing of your comments : quote : “The sterling would probably be a little bit depreciated than it is currently” Un-Quote.

In which case not only would Britain not be able to afford its over-reliance on imports, most people would not be able to afford to live !

And any value beneath € 1.40 = £1 would provide Britain a huge competitive advantage, which France, Germany et al would simply not accept. Back to the textbooks for a little longer I fear Marion : with much case study added in !

Check my web page : it was all forecast there back in 2004 : and later analysis too.

ds Réagir à ce commentaire
Georg Johannes Schiller
5 juillet 2009
01:40
UK : Will the weak Sterling rescue the British economy ?

As a non-economist I honestly have to say that both of you, Ms.Laboure and Mr.Feltham, have certain good points mentioned, even if the criticism of Mr.Feltham showed some more profound arguments ! But even so, the current discussion of adapting the Euro, despite its disadvantages for the UK, will become more and more necessarily if the UK wants to stay more or less stabilized and so our current-capitalistic-society.

A much more interesting question so would be why we moved towards such centralized-economy-systems ?! Is this approach comparable to anything like that in human-history ? And what is the conclusion out of that ? Is there any connection between the multiplying military budgets in our worlds and the greater becoming currency-regions ? And what factor does our current capitalistic-society play in connection with this, at such dimensions probably never realized, system-crisis ?

@Ms.Laboure and Mr.Feltham, instead of asking yourself what would be the right economic-steps to choose, you should wake up and realize that such decisions will never be satisfying due to the contradiction in our current-capitalistic-society ! This well-known-contradiction is probably one of a very rare and simultaneously crucial nature which is be faced by authorities throughout the world ! Namely : doing something good for mankind or doing something good for the capitalistic-market ! Both, as well as you probably (should) know, is not approachable especially at this time-period !

On the contrary, you should rather ask yourself what is the best we can do in such a miserable-capitalistic-situation ! What new forms of living could be existing ? What shall we do with our authoritarian-democracy ? Is there a better form of democracy ? Would participation by the population obstruct the fatal political decisions like war, environment pollutions, supporting private banks and finally the ancient habit of preferring the well-being of money instead of human kind ?

Consequently, why not just rethinking what great persons like J.Christ, S.Freud and K.Marx said and drawing the right conclusions out of it ? and basing on that an economy approach ?

Well, that would be something new, wouldn’t it ???

Well, maybe it is to radical for most people, especially economists ?, to think in such a way in which love as such will be acknowledged !

Well, in the end YOU decide whether you follow the trot or whether you touch new grounds...

Michael C Feltham
14 juillet 2009
21:57
SOcio-Economic Analyses
UK : Will the weak Sterling rescue the British economy ?

Quote : « 

But even so, the current discussion of adapting the Euro, despite its disadvantages for the UK, will become more and more necessarily if the UK wants to stay more or less stabilized and so our current-capitalistic-society

 » Un-Quote.

You fail, of course, Georg, to promote any rational or cogent points why and where Britain ought to join an already flawed monetary system !

Personally, I do agree with some of the philosophy you espouse : the current slavish adherence to Market Economies, like so many socio-economic eras is transitory.

The developed Western world urgently needs another system of managing its economic basis and reward dynamics.

Read my analysis on Captialism here : http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publi...

MCF

ds Réagir à ce commentaire
ds Ajouter un commentaire

Auteurs

Marion Laboure

Diplômée en Gestion & Economie de l’Université Paris Dauphine et de la Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien en Autriche, Marion termine son master cette année à la London School of Economics and Political Science. Ses thèmes de prédilection sont les (...)

On the internet

The Bank of England
Information about English monetary policy

The European Central Bank
All about European Monetary Union

The European Commission
Representation in the United Kingdom
Last comment

Personnalité trouve votre site internet a dire vrai important. Moi-même projete que moi reexaminer quand le temps pour parcourir dire. casino avec bonus sans (...)

Marian on The EU and the ICC: Wedding bells? | 22 May 2012, 10:46 (1)

Ego trouve le site internet en verite captivant. Moi espere moi-même reintegrer lorsque l’envis pour decouvrir dire. casino en ligne bonus sans depot

Sharon on European Commission Pensions Green (...) | 18 May 2012, 16:03 (1)

Ego trouve votre site absolument interessant. Moi envisage ego reexaminer lorsque l’envis afin de feuilleter nouveaux articles. casino en ligne sans depot

Loraine on Consultation opens on gay marriage (...) | 18 May 2012, 15:59 (1)

Moi devouvre le site internet en verite captivant. Moi projete que ego regagner lorsque le temps afin de consulter revue. casino sans depot

Jeannine on Getting Europe closer to its citizens - | 18 May 2012, 15:54 (1)

Ego devouvre le website vraiment captivant. Moi projete qui personnalité rememorer lorsque plus de temps afin de bouquiner nouveaux articles. casino bonus sans (...)

Marsha on Discover: Malta | 18 May 2012, 15:54 (3)

Who's been tweeting?
Facebook

The Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence of the University of Roma Tor Vergata, in partnership with Eurosduvillage group, is organizing the eighth edition of the Jean Monnet Summer Seminar a high level seminar on the functioning of the European Union addressed to graduate and Phd students as well as young civil servants. The seminar include two teaching modules lasting one week. The first module (4-8 July) will analyze the decision making process of the European Union while the second one (11-15 July) the foreign policy of the European Union. For more information and registration go to: http://www.eusummerseminar.uniroma2.it/

Jean Monnet Summer Seminar

Politics
Economy
Media & Society
Green business
Internal Affairs
External Affairs
Institutions & Brussels Bubble
United Kingdom
EU 27
Rest of Europe
World
© Groupe Euros du Village 2010 | Legal notice | Site réalisé avec SPIP | Technical realisation and design : Media Animation & Euros du Village France